Negative labelling & stereotyping of teachers who don’t adopt technology won’t help achieve change

Bad or Good

Bad or Good

When you’ve successfully made a change or mastered a new skill, it can be hard to appreciate how difficult it may be for others to do so. Particularly those who are quite different to you.

Instead, we usually think ‘hey, that wasn’t so hard and this new way of doings things is so awesome, everyone should make this change’. As a result, innovators and early adopters of technology can quickly become frustrated that their colleagues aren’t enthusiastically embracing the new world of learning and teaching with technology.

In some cases, this frustration leads to the negative labelling and stereotyping of these colleagues. In this post I share a few examples of what these labels and stereotypes might look like and the problems associated with them. Along the way I’ll also give a few suggestions for practical strategies that might be more effective in helping to achieve widespread change.

[bctt tweet=”What are the problems with negatively labelling & stereotyping teachers who don’t adopt new technologies?” username=”samvardanega”]

The ‘excuse’ label

At conferences filled with their peers, innovators and early adopters have been known to declare that their slow-moving colleagues are using their low tech skills as an ‘excuse’ for not embracing new ways of teaching and learning. They’re looked down upon for this, with the general sentiment being that it is not a valid reason.
However, the fact is that many educators do lack technology skills and they do see this as a significant barrier to using more technology in their classrooms. Technology has a way of making people feel helpless and inadequate and zapping their confidence in their own abilities. When you struggle to master the photocopier, you’re unlikely to have the confidence needed to take risks with new tools in a room of students.


‘But they don’t need to know how to do everything!’ I hear some of you say – ‘they can just get the students to show them how, let them run the technology in the classroom’. As simple a solution as this may sound, it’s one that innovators and early adopters are likely to feel comfortable with (after all, they came up with it) but not the majority. Why? Because even though the innovators and early adopters may not understand or have used the specific tool their students are using, they still have a core set of technology skills and an underlying confidence to fall back on. If you don’t have this fall back (as many people still don’t) it can be very difficult to jump into the deep water. Further, a teacher with low technology confidence who does try something new and has it fail will experience a significant blow to their self-belief. In many cases this will deter them from trying again.


However much you might agree or disagree with the above, the practice of disregarding people’s concerns or proposing unsuitable solutions is not going to help increase the use of technology in our schools. We need to stop doing this and start taking these so-called ‘excuses’ seriously. We would never brush off a student with low literacy skills who was worried about reading aloud to the class. Never just say ‘you’ll be fine, just get another student to show you what to do’. Instead, we would give them help, support and encouragement to develop their capabilities and make achievements at a pace that suited their needs. We must do the same thing with colleagues who lack digital skills and confidence. We need to help them master the basics and then achieve success that will build their skills and self-confidence.

[bctt tweet=”We need to help colleagues who lack digital skills & confidence to master the basics & achieve success” username=”samvardanega”]


Biased metaphors

In an attempt to understand our colleagues who aren’t keenly embracing educational technologies, explanations such as the ‘Pencil Metaphor(originally by Lindy McKeown and derived from the technology adoption lifecycle) are heavily distributed online. While I agree that we need to better understand others lack of adoption, I actually believe these kinds of metaphors are both unfair and unhelpful. Why? Because they are categorising large groups of people based on innovators and early adopter’s opinion of them. While these labels may accurately describe our perceptions of some members of these groups, they certainly do not capture their real feelings, thoughts and challenges in regards to technology adoption. Instead of providing guidance on how to support these people, the likes of the Pencil Metaphor only succeed in reinforcing stereotypes.


We need to stop creating and spreading biased and unhelpful metaphors. Instead, I’d love to see a similar diagram that delivered (research-backed) insight into what might be challenging people at each stage and what they need to overcome these challenges. This would actually provide useful information and tools that could be used to achieve change.


The ‘blockers’ and ‘resistors’ label

When going through any change process, those at the forefront often favour words such as ‘resistors’ or ‘blockers’ to label those who are seen to not be towing the line. I’ve noticed such terms are also popular among educators and at professional development sessions. Statements such as ‘We must find ways to overcome the blockers!’ and ‘This tool/technology/idea would have been successful if it wasn’t for the resistance of my colleagues’ are common. As such, this ‘resistance’ and ‘blocking’ is seen as a negative thing and the perpetrators of it as difficult, disagreeable people that must be silenced and overcome.


Before I go into my thoughts and opinions on this practice, let me share some research that I find interesting.


Dent and Goldberg (1999) discuss that a common misconception is that all people resist change. While people may resist some of the outcomes associated with change (such as loss of status or comfort), it is incredibly rare they just resist change for the sake of doing so. Piderit (2000) highlights that it is common practice for resistance to be perceived negatively, given that people who exhibit resistive behaviours are seen as disobedient. However, she notes that by taking this viewpoint, the potentially positive motivations or valid concerns underlying the dissent are ignored.


Piderit (2000) also writes that resistance is often used as a convenient explanation for change efforts that achieve unsatisfactory results. She believes that the fundamental attribution error (human tendency to blame undesired outcomes on the internal characteristics of a person, not external factors) plays a role in this. Indeed, both change leaders and change recipients are likely to blame the other for change implementation problems, rather than consider their own roles in the situation.


Ford, Ford and D’Amelio (2008) extend on this further by identifying that the whole concept of resistance assumes that the change being implemented is the right thing to do – ie. that change leaders are in the ‘right’ and those people objecting are in the ‘wrong’. Therefore, resistance is considered an unwarranted response that is independent of any interactions or relationships between change leaders and change recipients. As a result, the potential of resistance as a useful resource in change efforts is ignored, as is the role of the change leader in contributing to the situation. The authors also make some interesting observations of how change leaders can actually breed resistance, which you might like to look into further.


Now for my take-aways from this research…
I believe that to achieve widespread adoption of technology in education, we need to stop using the labels ‘blockers’ and ‘resistors’ to throw aside the concerns of people who challenge the changes we are trying to implement. Instead, we need to see every question, disagreement and philosophical difference as an opportunity for professional discourse and learning. Only by properly understanding the motivations, opinions and concerns of those who challenge our ideas, and they ours, can we achieve sustained and long-lasting change across the entire education sector.

[bctt tweet=”When striving for change, we need to see every question, disagreement & philosophical difference as an opportunity for professional discourse and learning.” username=”samvardanega”]

Those of us leading change also need to accept that we can and will contribute to have implementation problems. Hence, if things aren’t going smoothly we need to stop just blaming others and look internally to see how we are contributing to the problem. Perhaps the ‘whys’ that have compelled us and other early adopters and innovators to change are not the same that will compel the majority. Perhaps we have overlooked impacts that are important to others. Perhaps we have not painted a clear picture of what change looks like and how it can be achieved.


I’m not suggesting that your colleagues are not contributing to slow change implementation too. They are. However, at the end of the day we cannot change their attitudes or behaviours. We can only change ours in ways that will result in them choosing to change their own.



Dent, E. B., & Goldberg, S. G. (1999). Challenging “resistance to change”. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 25-41.

Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D’Amelio, A. (2008). Resistance to change: The rest of the story. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 362-377.

Piderit, S. K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of management review, 25(4), 783-794.

Related Post

The right ways to enable AI at work – Tips for IT Lead

In today’s fast-paced workplace, maximizing efficiency while minimizing time spent on repetitive tasks is crucial. However, many staff members may feel unsure about integrating AI effectively, leading to missed productivity opportunities. As the IT lead, you can guide your team in harnessing AI’s power to streamline operations and save time. By providing clear guidance and


Streamline Your Workflow: Upgrade to Microsoft Graph PowerShell now!

Are you wondering what to do now that Azure AD, Azure AD Preview and MSOnline PowerShell modules are officially deprecated? It’s time to upgrade to Microsoft Graph PowerShell for a seamless experience! Simplify Your Workflow with Microsoft Graph PowerShell With the official deprecation of Azure AD, Azure AD Preview, and MSOnline PowerShell modules Microsoft Graph


Embracing Technological Change: A Leadership Guide

In today’s fast-paced world, technological advancements are reshaping industries at an unprecedented rate. As leaders, it’s crucial to navigate these transformations effectively and inspire our teams not only to adapt but thrive. The challenge comes when we want to integrate the authentic use and integration of technology as part of this change. Here are three


How well do you use the
Apple Apps Google Workspace Microsoft 365
tools in your workplace?

Find out if you’re working with the tools OR if you’ve got the
tools working for you.

What Industry Are You In?

Using Apple Apps, Google Workspace or Microsoft 365?

What Type of user are you?

🫣 Entry User | 🤹 Skilled User | 👑 Elite User

Take the quiz to find out. 

Privacy Policy

Using Technology Better Privacy Commitment


We hold the privacy of your personal information in the highest regard.

Using Technology Better regards customer privacy as an important part of our relationship with our customers. The following privacy policy applies to all Using Technology Better users, and conforms to Internet privacy standards.

This policy will be continuously assessed against new technologies, business practices and our customers’ needs.

If you have questions or concerns regarding this statement, you should first contact the support team on our Contact Us Page.

Collection of Information

In order to use the Using Technology Better website, we may require information from you in order to provide the best service possible.

All correspondence may also be collected and stored, particularly in regard to sales, support and accounts, including Email.

Any information collected by Using Technology Better is collected via correspondence from you or your company. This may be via the telephone, Email, mail, fax or directly through our website.

Visitors and customers of will have their information shared back to DAIWABO INFORMATION SYSTEM CO., LTD. and DIS Service & Solution Co., Ltd.

Use of Collection Information

Any details collected from Using Technology Better customers is required in order to provide you with our

products and/or services, and a high level of customer service.

Correspondence is recorded in order to provide service references, and to assist in our staff development.

Web Site Use Information

Similar to other commercial Web sites, our Web sites utilize a standard technology called “cookies” (see explanation below, “What Are Cookies?”) and web server log files to collect information about how our Web site is used.

Information gathered through cookies and Web server logs may include the date and time of visits, the pages viewed, time spent at our Web site, and the Web sites visited just before and just after our Web site.

Storage of Collected Information

The security of your personal information is important to us. When you enter sensitive information (such as credit card numbers) on our website, we encrypt that information using secure socket layer technology (SSL).

When Credit Card details are collected, we simply pass them on in order to be processed as required. We never permanently store complete Credit Card details.

We follow generally accepted industry standards to protect the personal information submitted to us, both during transmission and once we receive it.

If you have any questions about security on our Website, you can email us at <ContactEmail>.

Access to Collected Information

If your personally identifiable information changes, or if you no longer desire our service, you may correct, update, delete or deactivate it by emailing us at <ContactEmail>.


If you purchase a product or service from us, we may request certain personally identifiable information from you.

You may be required to provide contact information such as:



Postal address

Your school or organisation

Financial information (such as credit card number, expiration date, name on card, card billing address).

We use this information for billing purposes and to fill your orders. If we have trouble processing an order, we will use this information to contact you.


Using Technology Better uses personally identifiable information for essential communications, such as


Accounts information

Critical service details.

We may also use this information for other purposes, including some promotional Emails.

If at any time a customer wishes not to receive such correspondence, they can request to be removed from any mailing lists by contacting support.

You will be notified when your personal information is collected by any third party that is not our agent/service provider, so you can make an informed choice as to whether or not to share your information with that party.

Third Parties

Using Technology Better may at its discretion use other third parties to provide essential services on our site or for our business processes.

We may share your details as necessary for the third party to provide that service.

These third parties are prohibited from using your personally identifiable information for any other purpose.

Using Technology Better does not share any information with third parties for any unknown or unrelated uses.

What Are Cookies?

A cookie is a very small text document, which often includes an anonymous unique identifier. When you visit a Web site, that site’s computer asks your computer for permission to store this file in a part of your hard drive specifically designated for cookies.

Each Web site can send its own cookie to your browser if your browser’s preferences allow it, but (to protect your privacy) your browser only permits a Web site to access the cookies it has already sent to you, not the cookies sent to you by other sites.

Browsers are usually set to accept cookies. However, if you would prefer not to receive cookies, you may alter the configuration of your browser to refuse cookies.

If you choose to have your browser refuse cookies, it is possible that some areas of our site will not function as effectively when viewed by the users.

A cookie cannot retrieve any other data from your hard drive or pass on computer viruses.

How Do We Use Information We Collect from Cookies?

As you visit and browse our Web site, the site uses cookies to differentiate you from other users. In some cases, we also use cookies to prevent you from having to log in more than is necessary for security.

Cookies, in conjunction with our Web server’s log files, allow us to calculate the aggregate number of people visiting our Web site and which parts of the site are most popular. This helps us gather feedback to constantly improve our Web site and better serve our clients.

Cookies do not allow us to gather any personal information about you and we do not intentionally store any personal information that your browser provided to us in your cookies.


We reserve the right to disclose your personally identifiable information as required by law and when we believe that disclosure is necessary to protect our rights and/or comply with a judicial proceeding, court order, or legal process served on our Website.


Links on the Using Technology Better site to external entities are not covered within this policy. The terms and conditions set out in this privacy statement only cover the domain name of

Changes to Privacy Policy

If we decide to change our privacy policy, we will post those changes to this privacy statement, and other places we deem appropriate so that you are aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it.

We reserve the right to modify this privacy statement at any time, so please review it periodically. If we make material changes to this policy, we will not use the personal information you have submitted to us under this Privacy Policy in a manner that is materially inconsistent with this Privacy Policy, without your prior consent

Delivery Policy

Most goods are digitally delivered instantly via email.  Our services may be delivered either via an online medium or live in person.

For our online delivery see below.  For services delivered live onsite, please refer to our speaker agreement form which is emailed to you on confirmation of booking.

Refund Policy

We do not offer refunds or returns unless we cannot supply goods or services or the goods or services are not delivered as promised.

Australian law is the governing body for all work, goods and services supplied by Using Technology Better.

Marketing Release

Using Technology Better (UTB) may film, record, and photograph me (the results of which are the “Recordings”). UTB may also incorporate into any production(s) any separate content (e.g., quotes, testimonials, biographical information, profiles, photos, videos, sound recordings, artwork, etc.) I provide to UTB or approve in writing (“Materials”).


I grant to UTB an irrevocable, perpetual, worldwide, royalty-free license to, in its sole discretion, (i) edit, translate, and modify the Recordings and the Materials, (ii) attribute the Recordings and Materials to me by my name, age, and city and state of residence, (iii) incorporate the Recordings and the Materials into content to promote UTB, its programs, or products (“Content”), and (iv) publicly use, distribute, reproduce, create derivative works from, and perform/display the Content, and any excerpts thereof, in any language.

2. No Compensation.

I grant this permission without any financial or other obligation of any nature.


For any issues or concerns please contact us